The good news is that everything that happens is no longer good for Republicans.
The bad news is that everything that happens is good for the DLC.
I don't mind bipartisanship up to a point; that point being "selling out to the Republicans to such a degree that you end up on the same side." So far, it looks like the reverse is happening: Dubya and his vanity war have generated so much ill will and mistrust for the Republicans and their policies that most Americans really want the Democrats to take the wheel for a while. Even if they can't steer us away from the cliff, they can at least kick the leaden Republican foot off of the accelerator.
Thanks to last November's anti-Bush referendum, many Congressional Republicans are now beginning to recognize this shift, and are jockeying for seats on the anti-Bush, anti-war bandwagon. "Bipartisanship" now means Republicans opposing an unpopular president to save their own skins. This is especially true of those Republicans up for re-election next year - the prospect of facing the voters tends to concentrate the mind.
Where Edsall and his DLC, establishment, "Money Party" cronies come in is to push the narrative that Democrats need to push a mushy, cautious, centrist agenda to lure on-the-fence Republicans over. While this would certainly get a lot of legislation passed, most of it wouldn't be worth the paper the lobbyists printed it on.
Edsall & Co's mistake is to underestimate the extent of the shift, and to misread what America voted for last year. I believe they voted for an agenda of change, integrity, accountability, and opposition (CIAO), and will not be satisfied with half-measures. Instead of tacking and triangulating and trying to figure out what Republicans will vote for, Democrats need to push for what their constituents (their citizen constituents) want and need. The Republicans can either get on board with them or try to explain their opposition in 2008 or 2010.
The Democrats haven't had an opportunity like this in 30 years - I don't want to see them squander it with needless capitulation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Well said Eli. I wish they don't listen to the stoopid DLC folks this time around.
But has Broderella weighed in on this one?
Well, Atrios linked to a Washington Monthly post today about how Broderella was rhapsodizing about Mitch McConnell, Bipartisan Dealmaker...
you know, i'd comment here more often but i'm pretty sure folks would get tired of reading me say "i agree with you, eli"
I wouldn't...
Post a Comment