Senator Corzine's persistent efforts to upgrade chemical plant security have been thwarted by the chemical industry and by the Bush administration's lack of support. He is now working on a new bill, in collaboration with Senators Susan Collins and Joseph Lieberman, that is likely to make some concessions to the chemical industry to improve its chances of passage. If Congress and the White House are serious about protecting the nation, they will make sure that his bill becomes law in the strongest possible form. There is an urgent need for greater security atTough on terror, my ass. Democrats need to hammer at this. Kerry should have hammered at this. If the Democrats had followed Rove's gameplan of attacking an opponent's supposed strengths, we would have had a Democrat landslide last year, gamed elections or no.
the plant sites. The industry should also be required to replace dangerous chemicals with safer alternatives. These steps may sound like common sense, but they have run into entrenched political opposition. The Bush administration's antiregulatory philosophy makes it reluctant to impose rules on private industry. And the chemical industry, a major campaign donor, seems intent on not spending the money that a strong safety law would cost it. Christie Whitman, the former E.P.A. administrator, became so frustrated by her inability to make any progress that she asked to be relieved of responsibility for chemical plant safety.
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Nothing To See Here, Part II
From today's NYT lead editorial:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Yes, I cannot understand why they do not, except they have done enough to be blackmailed? Or they have been threatened, or they don't give a damn about the common people. Guess what I think it is?
Or how about they're just clueless and chickenshit? I think they're just flat-out *afraid* to accuse Fearless Leader of being soft on terror, because everyone *knows* what a big anti-terror stud he is.
Post a Comment